|
|
Post by sirfred on Sept 5, 2017 20:50:36 GMT
Get him OUT before Saturday or you can shove my 15 Quid up his hairy arse
|
|
|
|
Post by Lobster on Sept 5, 2017 20:58:37 GMT
That makes no sense, but I still agree.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 5, 2017 21:04:24 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by sirfred on Sept 5, 2017 21:07:42 GMT
Come on Goat's & R carry on with comments like that and the 15 quid will go up your arse
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 5, 2017 21:09:27 GMT
Not like someone who works at the Tax Office to throw £15 away...  |
|
|
|
Post by embalmer on Sept 5, 2017 21:09:52 GMT
Jog on back to your own forum you weird little virgin. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 5, 2017 21:10:37 GMT
Aaaaaarg didums
|
|
|
|
Post by boughtonblue on Sept 5, 2017 21:12:23 GMT
Christ you lot were creaming yourselves over Mills |
|
|
|
Post by steveo1 on Sept 5, 2017 22:58:10 GMT
Christ you lot were creaming yourselves over Mills Exactly. Can't talk, how much did you pay for Mills again? |
|
|
|
Post by blaconcasual1 on Sept 5, 2017 23:24:17 GMT
Not like someone who works at the Tax Office to throw £15 away... you orrible 6 fingered inbred muppet,why do you come here? Jog on,f**k off & go play on dead passion! |
|
|
|
Post by Forever Blue on Sept 5, 2017 23:35:21 GMT
This is what you get from a goat when they have licked there bollocks and have nothing better to do.
|
|
|
|
Post by Cestrian1987 on Sept 6, 2017 0:13:56 GMT
You are a grown man. An actual adult. Wow |
|
|
|
Post by massivefloodlights on Sept 6, 2017 10:17:41 GMT
IN IN IN IN
|
|
|
|
Post by Lobster on Sept 6, 2017 10:46:26 GMT
He is annoying and a troll, but he makes a fair point that there's no record of anyone opposing or expressing doubt about the contract at the time. Everyone either agreed with it, or had doubts but kept them quiet. That means that if you believe the board were wrong or irresponsible to offer him the contract, you basically have to accept that you went along with it at the time and perhaps as fans we've all learned a lesson here.
Ultimately, the contract has really hurt us. Assuming McCarthy is now sacked, not only will we need to come up with the funds to pay him off, but it means we've also delayed the dismissal of a failing manager, leaving the new man playing catchup with a squad he inherits off someone else. It raises the question of what sort of contracts we should be handing out, and what types of managers we can realistically go for. You might say it should be one year maximum, but can we attract the best possible candidates doing this?
Tough decisions to be made, and perhaps some understanding needed among supporters.
|
|
|
|
Post by trublu on Sept 6, 2017 11:04:32 GMT
To play devil's advocate Lobster, anybody who had dared to express any doubt over any decision made within the club had been systematically removed from devachat over a period of nearly 5 years before that, so it had ceased to be a fair reflection of feeling amongst the supporter base.
I personally had no issues with the contract when it was signed, though, however had I known the financial implications of getting out from under it, I feel I would have been unnerved.
Would it not be possible to offer a manager a 2 year contract with a performance clause? Something along the lines of no home win for 9 months and your out. Surely any self respecting candidate wouldn't be phased by something reasonable like that?
One thing I've seen written by many is 'It's a results business', while the bloke certainly deserved the boot on that rationale, moreover its actually entertainment business. That's what McCarthy, and far too many football managers in General, seem to forget when justifying these awful tactics.
|
|
