|
Post by Al on Sept 6, 2017 4:42:04 GMT
As the title states. If the board don't act within the next 24/48hrs do we call an EGM to, as CFU members.
Issue a vote of no confidence in McCarthy?
|
|
|
Post by paulie on Sept 6, 2017 5:36:10 GMT
As the title states. If the board don't act within the next 24/48hrs do we call an EGM to, as CFU members. Issue a vote of no confidence in McCarthy? Paulie's prediction.. club statement 12 bells. Mcarthy gone. If he is in charge for Saturdays match then the EGM is a must, it's gone beyond a joke now, action is needed ASAP.
|
|
|
Post by Lobster on Sept 6, 2017 5:45:18 GMT
Yes, if. But I'd be surprised if he isn't gone by this evening.
|
|
Duck
New Member
Posts: 23
|
Post by Duck on Sept 6, 2017 6:32:32 GMT
Does anyone know the technicalities of how to call an EGM? I did a quick Google and it suggested a minimum of 14 days are required. 14 more days of this clown could do a lot of damage to this club!
As I say that was only a quick Google so it's probably wrong!
|
|
|
Post by billyw on Sept 6, 2017 6:35:34 GMT
As the title states. If the board don't act within the next 24/48hrs do we call an EGM to, as CFU members. Issue a vote of no confidence in McCarthy? Yes.
|
|
|
Post by devaboyreturns on Sept 6, 2017 6:35:57 GMT
I believe just 50 CFU Members are needed to call an EGM. One should definitely be called if McCarthy isn't removed today, that said, I would now fully expect the board to pull the plug on this reign by this evening at the latest.
|
|
|
Post by blue4life on Sept 6, 2017 7:32:01 GMT
I'm not a CFU member but I agree that a EGM should be called if he's not gone by today.
|
|
|
Post by Johnnybling on Sept 6, 2017 7:32:04 GMT
Absolutely it's time, a bit late should of happened after Macclesfield
|
|
|
Post by gone4eva on Sept 6, 2017 8:13:39 GMT
Sack the board should be the fans vote.
The board is elected to make decisions, you can't vote for 'sack the manager' resolutions otherwise its a direct vote rule for everything on the pitch.
There has to be separation in this model.
If you feel EGM is worth it, it is the board to target.
People will reply no no no... but it is true.
|
|
|
Post by southernblue on Sept 6, 2017 8:56:29 GMT
Let's wait to see what transpires today shall we?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 6, 2017 9:06:49 GMT
Believe there is an ops board meeting tonight. Be very surprised if the manager is still in charge after that.
If he is still in place tomorrow morning, I will vote for an EGM.
|
|
|
Post by Hannibal on Sept 6, 2017 9:23:01 GMT
Believe there is an ops board meeting tonight. Be very surprised if the manager is still in charge after that. If he is still in place tomorrow morning, I will vote for an EGM. I was just told about the emergency board meeting tonight Mark and hopefully the nightmare will be ended. Fingers crossed. It will, however, be like turning the Titanic though and whoever comes in will have a mammoth task to keep us up this season, especially with such an unbalanced squad and no money.
|
|
|
Post by Harry Lime on Sept 6, 2017 10:26:11 GMT
We would need 20% of the current CFU membership to sign something and hand it in at the club, to force an EGM.
Let's see what happens today first.
Actually rather than officially force one, why don't we just request one? Announce it for Thursday, or maybe next Monday, in the Blues Bar and thrash it out? Turnout would be interesting.
|
|
|
Post by Al on Sept 6, 2017 11:16:51 GMT
No need for it now. He's gone
|
|
|
Post by gone4eva on Sept 6, 2017 12:10:38 GMT
No need for it now. He's gone Who appointed him? Who signed off on the stupidly huge contract? What lessons have been learnt etc etc etc Or does Jon carry the can for it all.
|
|
|
Post by Al on Sept 6, 2017 12:59:52 GMT
No need for it now. He's gone Who appointed him? Who signed off on the stupidly huge contract? What lessons have been learnt etc etc etc Or does Jon carry the can for it all. Concentrate on mourning someone elses dead cat mate. it's what you do best
|
|
|
Post by gone4eva on Sept 6, 2017 21:54:07 GMT
Who appointed him? Who signed off on the stupidly huge contract? What lessons have been learnt etc etc etc Or does Jon carry the can for it all. Concentrate on mourning someone elses dead cat mate. it's what you do best Nothing to see here, he awarded himself a two year deal! Perhaps answer the points rather than personal abuse? Are you capable of that?!
|
|
|
Post by bagoftricks on Sept 7, 2017 8:10:55 GMT
No need for it now. He's gone Who appointed him? Who signed off on the stupidly huge contract? What lessons have been learnt etc etc etc Or does Jon carry the can for it all. These are the questions that need answering
|
|
|
Post by gone4eva on Sept 8, 2017 16:52:26 GMT
Come on Al - able to chuck more abuse at me on other threads but duck these questions.
|
|
|
Post by Al on Sept 8, 2017 18:31:11 GMT
Come on Al - able to chuck more abuse at me on other threads but duck these questions. Hardly "abuse" is it. Just calling it what it is. The board as a whole decided to approve his 2yr deal. You already know this so I don't see why you need it spelling out to you again
|
|
|
Post by gone4eva on Sept 8, 2017 21:36:31 GMT
It was a terrible decision, has cost us thousands possibly tens of thousands of pounds.
Should it be reviewed and accountable decisions, or do you want us to move on and brush it under the carpet?
|
|
|
Post by Al on Sept 9, 2017 8:05:40 GMT
It was a terrible decision, has cost us thousands possibly tens of thousands of pounds. Should it be reviewed and accountable decisions, or do you want us to move on and brush it under the carpet? In hindsight it was a poor decision and I would hope that the current board, and those that follow after the AGM will learn from the mistakes of the previous board. What I'm not about to do is grab my pitchfork and start off a witchhunt which is no doubt what you'll end up trying to start going off your previous form
|
|
|
Post by gone4eva on Sept 9, 2017 15:01:37 GMT
It was a terrible decision, has cost us thousands possibly tens of thousands of pounds. Should it be reviewed and accountable decisions, or do you want us to move on and brush it under the carpet? In hindsight it was a poor decision and I would hope that the current board, and those that follow after the AGM will learn from the mistakes of the previous board. What I'm not about to do is grab my pitchfork and start off a witchhunt which is no doubt what you'll end up trying to start going off your previous form Previous form? You mean my 'witchhunt' of the manager that has just been sacked for being shite? Think you need to take the blinkers off chap and not accept rubbish just because people are your mates.
|
|
|
Post by Si on Sept 9, 2017 16:56:12 GMT
I'm sure the board will think twice before being too hasty with 2 year deals in the future. That's as much as you can expect really, the board aren't deliberately trying to put us in these situations and at the time it wasn't the worst thing in the world to do. I don't think anyone could foresee just how bad we would end up becoming and sadly it's been an expensive lesson to learn. No point in dwelling on it now, but we just need to be mindful in the future.
|
|
|
Post by gone4eva on Dec 23, 2017 17:37:25 GMT
Sack the board should be the fans vote. The board is elected to make decisions, you can't vote for 'sack the manager' resolutions otherwise its a direct vote rule for everything on the pitch. There has to be separation in this model. If you feel EGM is worth it, it is the board to target. People will reply no no no... but it is true. Quick reminder for those having a go at how it all works.
|
|
|
Post by gone4eva on Dec 26, 2017 18:06:34 GMT
Sack the board should be the fans vote. The board is elected to make decisions, you can't vote for 'sack the manager' resolutions otherwise its a direct vote rule for everything on the pitch. There has to be separation in this model. If you feel EGM is worth it, it is the board to target. People will reply no no no... but it is true. Post made in SEPTEMBER. Nothing has changed.
|
|
|
Post by gone4eva on Jan 21, 2018 15:47:09 GMT
I was searching back for EGM stuff and although this was not trendy back in September as things were not so obvious there might be more appetite for it now.
In terms of the meeting in a few days, a formal motion for an EGM could be made, as then notification for all CFU members is obligatory.
If so, the question would be what would be the motion / motions .... and what details of the process would have to take place?
"The membership of the CFU have no confidence in the Board and would ask them to consider their positions."
"A full financial statement of current standing be provided to members within 7 days."
"A full financial projection be provided to members within 7 days."
|
|
|
Post by canadianexile on Jan 21, 2018 20:04:13 GMT
Isn't there a meeting on Thursday anyway?
|
|
|
Post by gone4eva on Jan 21, 2018 22:56:27 GMT
Isn't there a meeting on Thursday anyway? Yes - however that could be the motion for that meeting from the floor, as I bet the wider significance of meeting Thursday will be unknown to most of the CFU.
|
|
|
Post by gezzer on Jan 22, 2018 9:06:41 GMT
Won't happen. All the faceless keyboard warriors and shit stirrers will not even be in attendance, they will be on here giving it even more
|
|