Whopper 3

I am starting to think Whopper3 was right all along about Maguire.

The interview process was badly flawed, Barrow and others never stood a chance.

Where have you heard this

Agree completely. Imagine Barrow, Money, Redfearn or any of the other experienced managers pointing out to MaGuire his mistakes.....? MaGuire wouldn’t like that. 

How can anyone possibly know what the interview process was like unless they were in it? They could ask the other applicants but - here's a shock - people don't tend to be that complimentary about interviews for jobs they don't get. As for Jon Richardson, his tweets were ridiculous and he should know better.

None of this is helping. Bignot's who we've got and while he wasn't everyone's first choice, he's not a joke appointment and deserves everyone's backing. I actually think four points from Maidenhead, Woking and Tranmere is not a bad return all things considered, certainly more than McCarthy would've got.

The problem is who am I to decide that he is using false information? What makes him false and others correct? I have to try and remain impartial on things like that as I don't want to censor opinion and decide who is right and who is wrong. Personally I do think he talking out of his arse but I don't think it would be correct of me to remove posts on that basis. What I should do is pick up on his repetitive trolling of calling McGuire incompetent....he is entitled to that opinion but religiously repeating it is just aimed purely at getting a reaction - I will try and get better at cutting that sort of thing out.

As others have said, the easiest way is to block or ignore him. He wants the reaction and generally he gets one. I wish I could block him but sadly I need the full oversight of what gets said on here to allow me to make informed decisions.

The problem with Whopper is that nearly everything else he posts is complete crap. On that basis, he probably doesn't know the truth better than us.

By repeatedly posting derogatory comments about an employee of the club, it seems personal. I get the feeling that he has been chastised by that person, and holds a grudge. That makes his views biased and bitter. A lie repeated often enough can eventually become the perceived truth. A keyboard is a dangerous weapon.

You can believe what you wish to be the truth, as we all can.  We all love a good conspiracy theory, but poor journalism and incessant name calling doesn't seem a good basis for belief to me. 

whopper3 knows nothing about the club. My nan is more in the know about CFC.

I think its madness suggesting the interviews were weighted in favour of Bignot. The only people that would know were the panel and the applicants themselves. All the applicants who were interviewed were men held in his esteem in the game and it seems very unlikely that they would slander the interview process of a club when they are out of work themselves. Word travels fast in football, and I can't think that those bad mouthing a club who didn't employ them would go down well when it comes to applying for future jobs. This nonsense should be put to bed and everyone get behind Bignot - longingly bleating about how we should have got Barrow will do us no good in this situation.

Bignot was always a strong candidate on paper and I am actually impressed with what he has accomplished so far - he ended the winless home run, earned a point at Tranmere, but has identified the weaknesses and is taking actions to sort it, which is a breath of fresh air from McCarthy thinking everything was great cos we had a good run a year ago. Granted, I couldn't make Saturday's game which sounded utterly horrendous and it sounded like his tactics weren't on point, but its early days and he'll still be figuring out who can and can't do a job for him. Just remember how tough a job this is.....a hugely unbalanced squad consisting of injury prone players, ones who's better days have been and gone, those who have questionable attitudes, and a frightening lack of fitness at this stage of the season. We have to be patient and he has to be given time, its as simple as that really.

"When he blatantly posts up false information in an attempt to wind folks up he should be warned of an infraction."



Forums are full of rumours and hear say. Lot's of people post false information on here and I don't see you having a pop at them.

"I get the feeling that he has been chastised by that person, and holds a grudge. That makes his views biased and bitter. A lie repeated often enough can eventually become the perceived truth"


Harry

Me calling Maguire incompetent is my subjective view of him. I have met and spoken to him numerous times by the way. How on earth can that be classified as a lie ?

Yeah i'm sure the cops are going to come smashing doors in at 6am over a cry baby on the internet

Actually Whopper I have blocked you.

Just seen your reply in the above post.

Yes. You are allowed to post your views, as long as they're not offensive. No problem with that.

However, make your point, and move on.

I blocked you because I got more and more fed up with just reading the same statement. It reduced my enjoyment of using this site. It's your life to use up posting the same thing every day. Doesn't mean everyone else wants to waste theirs reading it again and again and again.

If you move on, maybe I'll remove my block. I still see some of your posts when people respond to you, but not otherwise.

I might sometimes disapprove of what he says, but I will defend to the death his right to say it.