|
Post by Al on Dec 5, 2020 21:11:47 GMT
.. Extend the managers current deal another 12 months based on current and previous performance?
|
|
|
Post by Matt on Dec 5, 2020 21:36:06 GMT
.. Extend the managers current deal another 12 months based on current and previous performance? This pandemic has taken us back to the recovery of 2018, maybe worse It’s a ridiculous poll considering the predicament we’re currently in, if the Club survives this season and we finish in the top 10, with players playing for free and players having taken a pay cut they should consider it one of their best achievements.
|
|
|
Post by Frank Owen’s Paintbrush on Dec 5, 2020 21:50:57 GMT
This season is about the club surviving, nothing more than that. For all we know it could be cancelled at any point.
They’re contracted for the whole of next season - that will be the one to judge them. Far too early to talk about this.
|
|
|
Post by avfo on Dec 5, 2020 22:25:53 GMT
.. Extend the managers current deal another 12 months based on current and previous performance? This pandemic has taken us back to the recovery of 2018, maybe worse It’s a ridiculous poll considering the predicament we’re currently in, if the Club survives this season and we finish in the top 10, with players playing for free and players having taken a pay cut they should consider it one of their best achievements. Not just players, Johnson and Morley have also taken pay cuts.
|
|
|
Post by whitey on Dec 6, 2020 0:13:10 GMT
.. Extend the managers current deal another 12 months based on current and previous performance? Get a grip of yourself for god's sake and look at the circumstances!
|
|
|
Post by Anders on Dec 6, 2020 0:23:17 GMT
Does feel a bit of a moot point given that they're contracted to Summer 2022.
|
|
|
Post by Al on Dec 6, 2020 7:45:29 GMT
Does feel a bit of a moot point given that they're contracted to Summer 2022. Ahhh thought it was summer 2021
|
|
|
Post by Moltisanti on Dec 6, 2020 7:56:28 GMT
Delete
|
|
|
Post by Al on Dec 6, 2020 7:58:34 GMT
Aye locked it if they're under contract until 2022.
Interesting tho of the people who did vote we were split right down the middle..
|
|
|
Post by Moltisanti on Dec 6, 2020 7:59:40 GMT
Aye locked it if thats theyre under contract until 2022. Interesting tho of the people who did vote we were split right down the middle.. I voted yes anyway. 😃
|
|
|
Post by geoff on Dec 6, 2020 8:42:09 GMT
I voted no as I realised they were contracted until 2022 and saw no point in extending now!
|
|
|
Post by chesterken on Dec 6, 2020 9:09:34 GMT
I wouldn’t judge anyone on this crazy season there has been stupid results throughout all the leagues possibly due to the lack of any atmosphere in the grounds, whatever happens this season we need to write it off and hopefully look forward to a more normal season next year.
|
|
|
Post by boughtonblue on Dec 6, 2020 9:55:34 GMT
Yes
|
|
|
Post by jb on Dec 6, 2020 11:20:07 GMT
It’s a free hit for the two managers this season as far as I’m concerned. The two main objectives are to avoid relegation and survive off the field.
|
|
|
Post by rcb on Dec 6, 2020 18:52:10 GMT
Unnecessary contract extension offered to Steve Burr, and costly when subsequently sacked. Fingers burnt? Not in the least, because the Board clearly love spending other people’s money, and went and gave another unnecessary extension to McCarthy which, yet again, cost a lot of money when he was sacked. OK, so let’s use the now famous, they are volunteers excuse, but surely they wouldn’t go for yet another managerial contract extension, particularly when up a financial creek with no paddle. I will avoid answering the question because it is not about the managers as far as I am concerned. We are a non-league, non sugar daddy club and have had more than one financial close shave and fan begging bowl on display, and are not at a level where we can afford two-year deals.
|
|
|
Post by Ian H Block on Dec 6, 2020 19:14:16 GMT
Unnecessary contract extension offered to Steve Burr, and costly when subsequently sacked. Fingers burnt? Not in the least, because the Board clearly love spending other people’s money, and went and gave another unnecessary extension to McCarthy which, yet again, cost a lot of money when he was sacked. OK, so let’s use the now famous, they are volunteers excuse, but surely they wouldn’t go for yet another managerial contract extension, particularly when up a financial creek with no paddle. I will avoid answering the question because it is not about the managers as far as I am concerned. We are a non-league, non sugar daddy club and have had more than one financial close shave and fan begging bowl on display, and are not at a level where we can afford two-year deals. How is it “other people’s money” ?
|
|
|
Post by rcb on Dec 6, 2020 19:34:52 GMT
Unnecessary contract extension offered to Steve Burr, and costly when subsequently sacked. Fingers burnt? Not in the least, because the Board clearly love spending other people’s money, and went and gave another unnecessary extension to McCarthy which, yet again, cost a lot of money when he was sacked. OK, so let’s use the now famous, they are volunteers excuse, but surely they wouldn’t go for yet another managerial contract extension, particularly when up a financial creek with no paddle. I will avoid answering the question because it is not about the managers as far as I am concerned. We are a non-league, non sugar daddy club and have had more than one financial close shave and fan begging bowl on display, and are not at a level where we can afford two-year deals. How is it “other people’s money” ? Because it is fan owned and no financial benefactor or share holders, or didn’t you realise?
|
|
|
Post by superman on Dec 6, 2020 19:58:51 GMT
You often refer to there being no share holders, and yet the constitution clearly states that 1 ordinary share of nominal value of £1 is registered in the name of each paid up member. How is that not being a share holder? Please explain the difference.
|
|
|
Post by Harry Lime on Dec 6, 2020 20:06:07 GMT
Unnecessary contract extension offered to Steve Burr, and costly when subsequently sacked. Fingers burnt? Not in the least, because the Board clearly love spending other people’s money, and went and gave another unnecessary extension to McCarthy which, yet again, cost a lot of money when he was sacked. OK, so let’s use the now famous, they are volunteers excuse, but surely they wouldn’t go for yet another managerial contract extension, particularly when up a financial creek with no paddle. I will avoid answering the question because it is not about the managers as far as I am concerned. We are a non-league, non sugar daddy club and have had more than one financial close shave and fan begging bowl on display, and are not at a level where we can afford two- year deals. It's not the length of the deal that is the issue, but rather the termination clause(s) contained in the contract. I've no idea what these are, but there could be a 3 month pay off deal in there, rather than the full remaining contract.
|
|
|
Post by spencerwhelanleftpeg on Dec 6, 2020 20:07:57 GMT
Mods can we lock this forum please ? Yes our current league position isn’t what we would all want . This season is about being in the healthiest position we can possibly be at the end of it if it should reach a conclusion . That’s the way the world is at the moment
|
|
|
Post by rcb on Dec 6, 2020 20:11:46 GMT
You often refer to there being no share holders, and yet the constitution clearly states that 1 ordinary share of nominal value of £1 is registered in the name of each paid up member. How is that not being a share holder? Please explain the difference. Do you want to buy mine?
|
|
|
Post by superman on Dec 6, 2020 20:20:38 GMT
You often refer to there being no share holders, and yet the constitution clearly states that 1 ordinary share of nominal value of £1 is registered in the name of each paid up member. How is that not being a share holder? Please explain the difference. Do you want to buy mine? You haven’t answered my question or offered an explanation, a bit like another frequent poster who avoids answering when factually challenged.
|
|
|
Post by Ian H Block on Dec 6, 2020 20:29:12 GMT
How is it “other people’s money” ? Because it is fan owned and no financial benefactor or share holders, or didn’t you realise? Always thought it was the Football Club’s money, but I stand corrected.
|
|
|
Post by Jack on Dec 6, 2020 20:30:18 GMT
I probably would. If we have a club at the end of this season and remain competitive on the pitch, that's a result - not everybody will be so lucky.
|
|
|
Post by Al on Dec 7, 2020 18:54:21 GMT
Mods can we lock this forum please ? Yes our current league position isn’t what we would all want . This season is about being in the healthiest position we can possibly be at the end of it if it should reach a conclusion . That’s the way the world is at the moment The poll has been locked for the reasons specified. Thought deal was due to expire in 2021. Turns out its 2022. On we go hey
|
|
dhw
Full Member
Posts: 143
|
Post by dhw on Dec 7, 2020 19:58:18 GMT
You haven’t answered my question or offered an explanation, a bit like another frequent poster who avoids answering when factually challenged. We are a benevolent society (community benefit society) - the one member one share relates to One member one vote - it serves no financial purpose and has no financial benefit to members. If, hypothetically, someone made a £200 million “offer” for the club as members / owners we would have no call on those funds. Hence all the talk around takeovers either here or at other nearby fan “owned” clubs is a bit of a misnomer. That’s how I understand it anyway!
|
|
|
Post by rcb on Dec 7, 2020 20:34:02 GMT
You haven’t answered my question or offered an explanation, a bit like another frequent poster who avoids answering when factually challenged. We are a benevolent society (community benefit society) - the one member one share relates to One member one vote - it serves no financial purpose and has no financial benefit to members. If, hypothetically, someone made a £200 million “offer” for the club as members / owners we would have no call on those funds. Hence all the talk around takeovers either here or at other nearby fan “owned” clubs is a bit of a misnomer. That’s how I understand it anyway! ORDINARY SHARE PROVISIONS 19. The ordinary shares of the Club shall be of the nominal value of £1.00. 20. If a member ceases to be a member, the ordinary share registered in the name of that member is to be cancelled and the amount subscribed for the share is to become the property of the Club. 21. Ordinary shares shall not be withdrawable and do not carry any rights to interest, dividend or bonus. All legal terminology, but in essence my £12 subs buy me an annual membership.
|
|