|
|
Post by prodigal on Jul 12, 2017 22:52:32 GMT
According to NWCFL website, we are playing FC Oswestry Town on Saturday, 10.30 am kick off at Sealand Road?  |
|
|
|
Post by prodigal on Jul 12, 2017 23:08:28 GMT
Also noticed this for 16th July:
14:00 Northwich Victoria v Steve Burr`s 2006 Vics Team at The Hinchliffe Holmes Stadium
|
|
|
|
Post by lachelane on Jul 12, 2017 23:46:12 GMT
Youth games maybe?
|
|
|
|
Post by oldboneze on Jul 13, 2017 5:58:20 GMT
According to the FC Oswestry Town website, they are playing away at Chester Nomads.
|
|
|
|
Post by Lobster on Jul 13, 2017 9:21:15 GMT
According to the FC Oswestry Town website, they are playing away at Chester Nomads. Yeah, looks like the NWCFL have confused us with the West Cheshire League side. |
|
|
|
Post by Lobster on Jul 13, 2017 9:23:18 GMT
Also noticed this for 16th July: 14:00 Northwich Victoria v Steve Burr`s 2006 Vics Team at The Hinchliffe Holmes Stadium You would think Burr would be quicker to support 1874 Northwich rather than the team representing the remnants of Jim Rushe's reign. |
|
|
|
Post by Firestick Frank on Jul 13, 2017 11:28:56 GMT
Also noticed this for 16th July: 14:00 Northwich Victoria v Steve Burr`s 2006 Vics Team at The Hinchliffe Holmes Stadium You would think Burr would be quicker to support 1874 Northwich rather than the team representing the remnants of Jim Rushe's reign. Burr proved during his time with us that he was only loyal to his bank account, not the supporters, so would make sense. |
|
|
|
Post by Lobster on Jul 13, 2017 11:37:47 GMT
Noticed on Chester Nomads' Twitter page though that it says they're hosting a Chester FC XI on July 26th.
|
|
|
|
Post by iandychesterfc on Jul 13, 2017 11:45:44 GMT
Also noticed this for 16th July: 14:00 Northwich Victoria v Steve Burr`s 2006 Vics Team at The Hinchliffe Holmes Stadium You would think Burr would be quicker to support 1874 Northwich rather than the team representing the remnants of Jim Rushe's reign. It's no longer the Jim Rushe project - has been bought out by the fans thus making 1874 quite redundant. |
|
