Why hasn't Maguire gone ?

Maguire was an integral part of the decision to extent McCarthys contract. He needs to go.

Maguire drove Stockport into the gutter and is doing the same at Chester.

Why are you calling for a ban? At a bit of a push it's trolling but that's all that's worth banning him for. I will say the jury is still out on Maguire for me until the club accounts are out and we can compare them to previous re: money being brought in by him.

Lets ban anyone who dmcnally doesn't agree with.

Whopper you need to stop watching Pirates of the Caribbean - your obsessed with walking the plank !

It's not about who I don't agree with there's many people I don't agree with but they don't just try and troll and go on a wind up. Calling for Maguire to go clearly just shows you're either a WUM or deluded

You're being disagreed with because you're telling whoppers whooper3

But unfortunately we seem to be the diametric opposite of Birmingham , through inaction and not being decisive, which has also led to very poor results. That McCarthy was allowed to remain and plod on in post for months after wholly unacceptable first team results /performances on the basis that everything would eventually click, shows we are frankly far too nice and naive . The Club seemed to be more concerned about the personal impact on Jon of losing his job and the benefits of his other peripheral roles, rather than acting decisively and rationally on footballing matters in the best interests of the Club. Even when he was removed , this was with an air of reluctance, despite his utter failure for months, which I found very annoying. The club seems to be far too cosy for the manager and players, with direct criticism seemingly in very short supply. MM was still defending the indefensible just before JMs inevitable departure, but again with complete silence to the wider fan base from the Board, or even Chairman. A much more hard-headed and professional attitude as regards First Team footballing matters is now required.

That's deva chat oldco behaviour.

Depends who you elect to the Board doesn't it, given we have votes to decide what type of Board we want. There are enough business owners/managers on it already to make it perfectly good in management terms in theory, but it is probably time for some new faces regardless.

Actually, you need to look up the definition of defamation. Calling someone incompetent in print is a dangerous game.

Surely that only applies to the likes of print media. Otherwise any footballer could have half the posters on their rivals' forum in court. I'm fairly sure you have to prove there's been a detrimental effect AND that it isn't true for it to be defamation.

In this case it'd be far too open to interpretation. Where do you draw the line of competence in football?

More fool you if that is what you believe. You wrote that exact word in your previous thread. You need to be careful what you put out on the internet, it CAN be used against you.

Definition of defamation

What are some examples?

Calling someone dishonest, corrupt, hypocritical, lazy, incompetent, criminal, unfaithful, or financially troubled. 

The publication or broadcast of any libelous or slanderous statement about an individual or business that can be proven to be false and published with the intention of harming that entity's reputation is considered to be defamation. Online defamation is the publication of such statements made on any Internet based media including blogs, forums, websites, and even social networking websites. While many Internet users believe that they are free to say and do as they like while on the Internet, this is untrue and the same defamation laws and regulations stand for online defamation as they do in any form of media

Can't be defamation - McCarthy was proven incompetent because he was ultimately sacked for dreadful results - results are surely what defines a football manager's competence. If that isn't proven incompetence I don't know what is.