|
Post by avfo on Oct 20, 2017 13:46:12 GMT
From CFU OWS -
The board of City Fans United (CFU) is pleased to announce that Jonny Hughes has been elected as the new chair of CFU.
Jonny was voted onto the board in 2016 and has since served as vice chair and as acting chair until the latest AGM.
Neil Bellis was elected as vice chair, Laurence Kirby remained as treasurer and Marion Needham was reappointed as secretary.
The board also appointed Laurence Kirby, Andrew Morris, David Harrington-Wright and Mark Jones to the operational board, joining Ron Smith.
The make up of the CFU board is - Neil Bellis, Mike Day, David Harrington-Wright, Jonny Hughes, Mark Jones, Laurence Kirby, Andrew Morris, Anne Salmon, David O’Toole and David Williams.
The board have also looked into the current portfolio structure and will update members shortly on a revised way of working, one that will enable the board to engage more with the membership, the wider fanbase and community as we look to grow this club together.
|
|
|
Post by Hannibal on Oct 20, 2017 15:00:05 GMT
Not much confidemce in that shower.
|
|
|
Post by luckyblue on Oct 20, 2017 15:09:21 GMT
Good luck to all board members....those re elected and those having a go for the first time. Without these people and their considerable time input and effort we would have no football team to support.
|
|
|
Post by Hannibal on Oct 20, 2017 16:03:04 GMT
Aye good luck, but must do better.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 20, 2017 16:54:16 GMT
Looking forward to finding out their responsibilities within the structure for the coming season.
It would be nice to receive regular updates from each of them too as to their progress against their aims and targets.
They need to seriously up their communication game, and show us what they are actually doing to deserve such prestigious office.
Its been a hiding place for the last 12 months, sending Mark Maguire out to face the flak when it started flying.
|
|
|
Post by happyclapper52 on Oct 20, 2017 18:20:52 GMT
Not much confidemce in that shower. Totally agree Mark. Each Director should submit a Quarterly Report on their Objectives and Achievements to date as we all have to do in a commercial environment.
|
|
|
Post by Hannibal on Oct 20, 2017 18:27:47 GMT
Not much confidemce in that shower. I've no wish to be a board member, but I do object to up to £150k of the clubs money being wasted on paying off failed managers. I support the club in different ways mainly by going to matches home and away. If you're happy with the way JM was backed almost to the point of destroying the club fair enough. My opinion.
|
|
|
Post by trev on Oct 20, 2017 22:13:37 GMT
From CFU OWS - The board of City Fans United (CFU) is pleased to announce that Jonny Hughes has been elected as the new chair of CFU. Jonny was voted onto the board in 2016 and has since served as vice chair and as acting chair until the latest AGM. Neil Bellis was elected as vice chair, Laurence Kirby remained as treasurer and Marion Needham was reappointed as secretary. The board also appointed Laurence Kirby, Andrew Morris, David Harrington-Wright and Mark Jones to the operational board, joining Ron Smith. The make up of the CFU board is - Neil Bellis, Mike Day, David Harrington-Wright, Jonny Hughes, Mark Jones, Laurence Kirby, Andrew Morris, Anne Salmon, David O’Toole and David Williams. The board have also looked into the current portfolio structure and will update members shortly on a revised way of working, one that will enable the board to engage more with the membership, the wider fanbase and community as we look to grow this club together.
As an ordinary CFU member, I am really looking forward to hearing from Jonny Hughes as the supposed figure head of the club at this difficult time, to at least engage with the fanbase and set out the Boards priorities. However I don't recall hearing from anyone on the Board communicating with the wider fanbase for months, and I don't feel that Mark Maguire should be wheeled out to always speak on behalf of the Board.
|
|
|
Post by oldboneze on Oct 21, 2017 8:44:43 GMT
Looking forward to finding out their responsibilities within the structure for the coming season. It would be nice to receive regular updates from each of them too as to their progress against their aims and targets.
They need to seriously up their communication game, and show us what they are actually doing to deserve such prestigious office. Its been a hiding place for the last 12 months, sending Mark Maguire out to face the flak when it started flying. Will be interesting to see the 'new' way of working and how it works in practice. It seems that board members will not have individual responsibilities, which could mean that there will be nothing against which to judge individual performance.
|
|
|
Post by Harry Lime on Oct 21, 2017 11:47:23 GMT
I've not seen or heard anything from Jonny Hughes in the past year to suggest he merits being Chairman of our club.
Any updates from him has been along the lines of "I'm working on this", rather than " I delivered this, and the benefits to the club are". It's difficult to see how the could drive the club forward, or lead the others.
It maybe that we need a MM figure around to actually deliver anything. Those having a pop at MM may want to ponder on that. Whatever faults he may have, it must be difficult at times. New sponsorship at the moment must be especially tough, given our drop in crowds.
|
|
|
Post by jollyboysam on Oct 21, 2017 12:16:04 GMT
Hmm,is that a wise comment publicly dissing somebody before they've started the role?
|
|
|
Post by The Swansway on Oct 21, 2017 13:34:16 GMT
Its been a hiding place for the last 12 months, sending Mark Maguire out to face the flak when it started flying. You are right. I wouldn't know Jonny Hughes if he jumped in front of me and dropped his trousers. Yet I could tell you how many suits Mark Maguire owns. I did wonder during the managerial change not a single board member popped their head above the trenches. Disappointing nobody appeared to step up.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 21, 2017 17:26:36 GMT
Looking forward to finding out their responsibilities within the structure for the coming season. It would be nice to receive regular updates from each of them too as to their progress against their aims and targets.
They need to seriously up their communication game, and show us what they are actually doing to deserve such prestigious office. Its been a hiding place for the last 12 months, sending Mark Maguire out to face the flak when it started flying. Will be interesting to see the 'new' way of working and how it works in practice. It seems that board members will not have individual responsibilities, which could mean that there will be nothing against which to judge individual performance.
Jesus seriously? Absolute joke that would be.
|
|
|
Post by embalmer on Oct 21, 2017 17:26:46 GMT
So the two directors who are responsible for the portfolio's we've seen absolutely no work done on for months (communication and marketing) have just been appointed as Chair and Vice Chair? A chairman we haven't heard a peep from since he took the role in an acting capacity? Dear me.
I noticed when reading the minutes on the CFU website that one of the co-opted directors proposed and implemented the use of some sort of communication application for use by the club - why isn't the "Communications" director doing this?! The mind boggles.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 21, 2017 18:04:16 GMT
So the two directors who are responsible for the portfolio's we've seen absolutely no work done on for months (communication and marketing) have just been appointed as Chair and Vice Chair? A chairman we haven't heard a peep from since he took the role in an acting capacity? Dear me. I noticed when reading the minutes on the CFU website that one of the co-opted directors proposed and implemented the use of some sort of communication application for use by the club - why isn't the "Communications" director doing this?! The mind boggles. Very disappointing this was, hardly inspiring choices. We need strong communicators on the board to drag this club through this bad patch, and neither has shown this as a strong point over the past six months. I follow all social media outlets, get CFU member newsletters and read the local press, and what do I know about them? One has brought in a streaming service for CFU meetings and the other has done nothing...
|
|
|
Post by Little Blue Boy on Oct 21, 2017 18:20:46 GMT
Jonny Hughes and Neil Bellis combined couldn't lead their way out of a paper bag.
|
|
|
Post by tarvinblue on Oct 21, 2017 18:25:24 GMT
Clear roles and responsibilities, reporting directly to members with tangible evidence of impact. That is the way the board should work. We can then all assess the impact of those that are voted on and entrusted to run the club on our behalf. How do they decide on roles and responsibilities? I would like to think there was some kind of skills audit? The mind boggles as to how those delivering nothing get themselves into positions such as this. And then people wonder why there is so much negativity and questioning of the board in general and the motivations of certain members.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 21, 2017 18:31:20 GMT
Jonny Hughes and Neil Bellis combined couldn't lead their way out of a paper bag. I wouldnt know as Ive never worked with them. Point I am trying to make is they could be bringing so much to the table, but the lack of communication means nobody would ever know.
|
|
|
Post by Harry Lime on Oct 21, 2017 18:33:47 GMT
Hmm,is that a wise comment publicly dissing somebody before they've started the role? Maybe not, if that were the case. But it isn't. He has been acting Chairman for months already. Not one statement has been made by him. His big ideas originally were along the new media opportunities provided by Snapchat etc. This was all over a year ago. His review of the year at the AGM was a series of slides and comments about the matches we played. Not what the club and board had achieved. He may have actually been excellent in the role. But how would we know? Maybe the communications board member should enlighten us. Oh hang on a minute. I don't know if you attend the CFU meetings, or watch online? If you haven't yet done so, I would suggest you do. Then form your own opinion. This is a crucial season and period for our club. Even our Finance Director doesn't feel our model is sustainable. Strong clear leadership is required. Actually it maybe that a number of other directors don't want the title or pressure of being Chairman, and that it's more of a ceremonial position in our cooperative.
|
|
|
Post by Hannibal on Oct 21, 2017 18:41:18 GMT
I think all these board members should spend 40 minutes before each home match mixing with the crowd, introducing themselves and answering reasonable questions. Apart from Lawrence Kirby I wouldn't have a clue who any of them are.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 21, 2017 18:43:10 GMT
Hmm,is that a wise comment publicly dissing somebody before they've started the role? Maybe not, if that were the case. But it isn't. He has been acting Chairman for months already. Not one statement has been made by him. His big ideas originally were along the new media opportunities provided by Snapchat etc. This was all over a year ago. His review of the year at the AGM was a series of slides and comments about the matches we played. Not what the club and board had achieved. He may have actually been excellent in the role. But how would we know? Maybe the communications board member should enlighten us. Oh hang on a minute. I don't know if you attend the CFU meetings, or watch online? If you haven't yet done so, I would suggest you do. Then form your own opinion. This is a crucial season and period for our club. Even our Finance Director doesn't feel our model is sustainable. Strong clear leadership is required. Actually it maybe that a number of other directors don't want the title or pressure of being Chairman, and that it's more of a ceremonial position in our cooperative. Nailed it pal. Even as a ceremonial position, it is one hell of a responsibility. He should be a figurehead for the club. The role should be the one from where board statements eminate. Ihets a bit unfair on the two fellas named above though, as several others are also responsible for sitting on their hands while McCarthy was allowed to resign failed players, and then go on to blow the Sam Hughes money as well.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 21, 2017 18:44:08 GMT
Maybe not, if that were the case. But it isn't. He has been acting Chairman for months already. Not one statement has been made by him. His big ideas originally were along the new media opportunities provided by Snapchat etc. This was all over a year ago. His review of the year at the AGM was a series of slides and comments about the matches we played. Not what the club and board had achieved. He may have actually been excellent in the role. But how would we know? Maybe the communications board member should enlighten us. Oh hang on a minute. I don't know if you attend the CFU meetings, or watch online? If you haven't yet done so, I would suggest you do. Then form your own opinion. This is a crucial season and period for our club. Even our Finance Director doesn't feel our model is sustainable. Strong clear leadership is required. Actually it maybe that a number of other directors don't want the title or pressure of being Chairman, and that it's more of a ceremonial position in our cooperative. Nailed it pal. Even as a ceremonial position, it is one hell of a responsibility. He should be a figurehead for the club. The role should be the one from where board statements eminate. Its a bit unfair just ragging on the two fellas named above though, as several others, many still on the board, are also responsible for sitting on their hands while McCarthy was allowed to resign failed players, and then go on to blow the Sam Hughes money as well.
|
|
|
Post by Harry Lime on Oct 21, 2017 19:00:38 GMT
Nailed it pal. Even as a ceremonial position, it is one hell of a responsibility. He should be a figurehead for the club. The role should be the one from where board statements eminate. Its a bit unfair just ragging on the two fellas named above though, as several others, many still on the board, are also responsible for sitting on their hands while McCarthy was allowed to resign failed players, and then go on to blow the Sam Hughes money as well. It maybe a bit unfair. Not sure though. If Simon Ollerenshaw had still been Chairman in April would JMc have been kept on, and all the new contracts handed out? I don't believe so. Difficult decisions are often made worse when you put them off. In this case the real error was probably the long contract extension. Ironically made when Simon was Chairman. I actually thought that when Simon offered his help to the Board towards the end of last season, it was to assist in removing JMc. I have no knowledge of that though, and may be entirely wrong.
|
|
|
Post by The Swansway on Oct 21, 2017 19:01:58 GMT
Seriously though, can anyone direct me to any internet or social media link which would introduce me to my football clubs current Chairperson?
|
|
|
Post by Firestick Frank on Oct 21, 2017 19:11:13 GMT
SO actually said today, in person, that he'd have sacked the CUCK (my term, not his) at the end of the season if he was still Chairman.
There are certain supporters who I would absolutely love to see on the board, sadly it's unlikely to happen. We literally haven't heard a peep from the current lot for years, other than at CFU meetings which, I have to say, have been rather bland with little or no tangible updates and similarly little challenging from those in attendance.
The whole club has had an air of apathy, to me, for the last few years and its seeped onto the pitch. Bignot is the best man for us, I still maintain, but we are certainly going to be playing regional football this time next year.
|
|
|
Post by embalmer on Oct 21, 2017 19:17:10 GMT
From what I've heard, some of the newer board members did try to remove McCarthy earlier in the season but were blocked from doing so by the old guard.
|
|
|
Post by Bluesontop on Oct 21, 2017 19:17:48 GMT
So how much in terms of much needed financial investment will these new board members bring to the table?
|
|
|
Post by Little Blue Boy on Oct 21, 2017 19:23:59 GMT
It is all very amateur. From the pally relationship some board members had with the manager, to the way we are communicated with. If any other business of our size had a Board of Directors like this it would have sunk a long time ago.
It makes me question the model to be honest. We need a board full of people like Ollerenshaw. Instead we get journalists and 'marketing executives'. With all due respect to those people, they aren't the sort that are usually required on a Board of Directors. We need business people, with tangible business experience and expertise.
|
|
|
Post by Bluesontop on Oct 21, 2017 19:30:16 GMT
It is all very amateur. From the pally relationship some board members had with the manager, to the way we are communicated with. If any other business of our size had a Board of Directors like this it would have sunk a long time ago. It makes me question the model to be honest. We need a board full of people like Ollerenshaw. Instead we get journalists and 'marketing executives'. With all due respect to those people, they aren't the sort that are usually required on a Board of Directors. We need business people, with tangible business experience and expertise. Nail on head.
|
|
|
Post by tarvinblue on Oct 21, 2017 19:34:44 GMT
It is all very amateur. From the pally relationship some board members had with the manager, to the way we are communicated with. If any other business of our size had a Board of Directors like this it would have sunk a long time ago. It makes me question the model to be honest. We need a board full of people like Ollerenshaw. Instead we get journalists and 'marketing executives'. With all due respect to those people, they aren't the sort that are usually required on a Board of Directors. We need business people, with tangible business experience and expertise. Absolutely spot on! The chairman should be someone with a business background, used to making tough decisions in pressurised environments. It makes my blood boil how some of these lot let their personal relationship with McCarthy lead their actions.
|
|