BREXIT

Not only that but the YouGov poll “result” on who won the ITV debate had Johnson at 51% and Corbyn at 49%. They polled 2,000 people. That’s one thing, but when you see that YouGov published this result at 6.50pm and the debate didn’t start until 8pm and didn’t end until 9pm it makes you wonder doesn’t it?

YouGov is run by Tory MP Nadhim Zahawi (who told the BBC last week that he genuinely doesn’t know whether or not Corbyn would actually in real life shoot rich people dead) and Tory pollster and former Tory parliamentary candidate Stephan Shakespeare. Doesn’t make you wonder anymore.

The official ITV Politics poll, with their political correspondent Paul Brand, had Corbyn at 78% and Johnson at 22% of 30,000 votes (28,000 more than the Tory-owned YouGov poll which was done before the debate started but purported to be a post-debate result...)

Plays well with the Gammon demographic.

Corbyn's opponents would literally defend the (pronunciation of a) name of a dead nonce before they would countenance some mildly redistributive policies. Imagine being more outraged about the pronunciation of a paedophile’s name than the sexual offences he committed against children.

Aye it isn’t even just Labour saying that, it’s the IFS too! Anything over about £25,500 per year is the top 50%!

Surely that bloke must be walking around Bolton wondering why others are worse off than he is - the average wage in Bolton is 23k.

The new Brexit Party's manifesto includes the pledge to automatically hold a referendum should a petition get more than 5 million signatures.

Considering a petition to Revoke Article 50 got over 6 million it appears the Brexit Party now back a 2nd Referendum on Brexit.

That car crash from Jo Swinson tonight was a real joy to behold. She got totally and utterly seen off by the audience.

Nothing scientific, but last time I started getting a really good feeling with a few days left of the election that something big was happening, I'm getting that again tonight.

Corbyn signing his own death warrant with the electorate with his “neutral” stance on Brexit. Just what the electorate didn’t want to hear after years of going round in circles.

At least the Labour Party can look to have a fit and proper leader in by 2020.

To be fair, given your incredible hot takes on this thread, I'm not surprised you need political leaders to instruct you how to vote. Unfortunately for you, I think most people are capable of making their minds up without being told how.

Imagine that guy going in a pub and thinking "I bet that bastard barmaid is on £100K a year while I'm scraping by on £80K!"

The problem is that the world is full of people like him who rant and rave, and even when they're told they're wrong and shown why, they still keep ranting. That idiot was still getting smatterings of applause while talking complete rubbish.

On the other hand, perhaps there's nothing better for a politician than for a member of the public to have a go at them and make a fool of themself. That episode will have done Labour no harm at all.

What is so uncertain about “you decide, and I will enact your decision”? We all want MPs who represent us don’t we?

BBC News’ economical with the truth editing policy continues, I see.

If you told a North Korean that you have to pay to be spoon-fed state propaganda or face prosecution, they would laugh at you.

We're not going to agree on this which is fair enough and I get why he's doing it eventhough I'm not convinced it will work.

I picked out the above though because it demonstrates how alien the idea of disagreeing with Corbyn is to some.

When they actually paid £0.0

Assuming he's talking about Amazon, their jobs and economic contribution is surely cancelled out by the damage they're almost single-handedly doing to the high street, especially since they are by all accounts not a good company to work for.