|
BREXIT
Jan 4, 2020 11:12:57 GMT
via mobile
Post by 1paulcarden on Jan 4, 2020 11:12:57 GMT
Corbyn & Leave?!! Christ. Jon McCarthy & Mark Maguire politics. Very common for socialists to be on the Leave side. It was the position taken by most of the minor socialist parties in the run-up to the election.
In a way, it's contradictory to be left-wing and pro-EU. My main problem with Brexit is the xenophobic, little Englander mentality that's dominated the debate, rather than any particular love of the EU.
How is it contradictory? This ‘EU is rampantly neoliberal’ nonsense is going to be replaced with the most far right, state ravaging government this country’s ever seen. Lexiteers will have enabled this through their own pig headedness. ‘Let’s keep workers rights and environmental protections but leave the world’s largest trading block to stop freedom of movement’ is one of the stupidest things I’ve ever heard. Always was going to be a race to to the bottom this.
|
|
|
BREXIT
Jan 4, 2020 11:15:38 GMT
via mobile
Post by 1paulcarden on Jan 4, 2020 11:15:38 GMT
Indeed as I posted the other day, Lexiteers (very good left wing cases for leaving the EU) were sounded out by the xenophobes who were more successful in getting their message across with simple soundbites rather than boring political talk. Name these very good left wing cases.
|
|
|
BREXIT
Jan 4, 2020 12:20:49 GMT
Post by Lobster on Jan 4, 2020 12:20:49 GMT
Very common for socialists to be on the Leave side. It was the position taken by most of the minor socialist parties in the run-up to the election.
In a way, it's contradictory to be left-wing and pro-EU. My main problem with Brexit is the xenophobic, little Englander mentality that's dominated the debate, rather than any particular love of the EU.
How is it contradictory? This ‘EU is rampantly neoliberal’ nonsense is going to be replaced with the most far right, state ravaging government this country’s ever seen. Lexiteers will have enabled this through their own pig headedness. ‘Let’s keep workers rights and environmental protections but leave the world’s largest trading block to stop freedom of movement’ is one of the stupidest things I’ve ever heard. Always was going to be a race to to the bottom this. I tend to agree that it was never going to work out well, but you're talking as though there were only two options - staying in the EU or Boris Johnson. The point is, the 'Lexiteers' (and christ how many words is that a portmanteau of, 3 or 4?) wanted a different direction for the country and saw both the Conservative government and the European Union as part of the problem. It looks like they've "solved" one problem but increased the other one tenfold.
|
|
|
BREXIT
Jan 4, 2020 17:53:23 GMT
via mobile
Post by 1paulcarden on Jan 4, 2020 17:53:23 GMT
How is it contradictory? This ‘EU is rampantly neoliberal’ nonsense is going to be replaced with the most far right, state ravaging government this country’s ever seen. Lexiteers will have enabled this through their own pig headedness. ‘Let’s keep workers rights and environmental protections but leave the world’s largest trading block to stop freedom of movement’ is one of the stupidest things I’ve ever heard. Always was going to be a race to to the bottom this. I tend to agree that it was never going to work out well, but you're talking as though there were only two options - staying in the EU or Boris Johnson. The point is, the 'Lexiteers' (and christ how many words is that a portmanteau of, 3 or 4?) wanted a different direction for the country and saw both the Conservative government and the European Union as part of the problem. It looks like they've "solved" one problem but increased the other one tenfold. Yep, exactly. Like the purity of Corbyn. Brought in to basically solve capitalism. Just like the left case for leaving the EU. Instead, we’ve had zero opposition and slept walked into disaster with two dire election performances,, his pitiful Brexit stance and shameful approach to anti Semitism. Labour should & would have had a majority by now with a half decent leader over the last 5 years. Instead it’s rotting in the political wilderness as it’s been lead by someone who could just about run a marmalade stall in Somerset.
|
|
|
BREXIT
Jan 4, 2020 22:51:39 GMT
Post by Deva Chanter on Jan 4, 2020 22:51:39 GMT
I tend to agree that it was never going to work out well, but you're talking as though there were only two options - staying in the EU or Boris Johnson. The point is, the 'Lexiteers' (and christ how many words is that a portmanteau of, 3 or 4?) wanted a different direction for the country and saw both the Conservative government and the European Union as part of the problem. It looks like they've "solved" one problem but increased the other one tenfold. Yep, exactly. Like the purity of Corbyn. Brought in to basically solve capitalism. Just like the left case for leaving the EU. Instead, we’ve had zero opposition and slept walked into disaster with two dire election performances,, his pitiful Brexit stance and shameful approach to anti Semitism. Labour should & would have had a majority by now with a half decent leader over the last 5 years. Instead it’s rotting in the political wilderness as it’s been lead by someone who could just about run a marmalade stall in Somerset.Polls have shown that this is total nonsense and yet it remains the common refrain of centrists for the last 5 years. Really weird but strangely enough, I'm never tripping over all of these millions of people who are absolutely crying out for a party led by Yvette Cooper or Jess Phillips. If you are so confident in your assertion, please could you explain both the political and psephological thresholds that such a leader, and it would also be helpful here if you could varnish your "half decent leader" with a name, would have successfully overcome to "have a majority"?
|
|
|
Post by Lobster on Jan 5, 2020 9:59:20 GMT
Yep, exactly. Like the purity of Corbyn. Brought in to basically solve capitalism. Just like the left case for leaving the EU. Instead, we’ve had zero opposition and slept walked into disaster with two dire election performances,, his pitiful Brexit stance and shameful approach to anti Semitism. Labour should & would have had a majority by now with a half decent leader over the last 5 years. Instead it’s rotting in the political wilderness as it’s been lead by someone who could just about run a marmalade stall in Somerset.Polls have shown that this is total nonsense and yet it remains the common refrain of centrists for the last 5 years. Really weird but strangely enough, I'm never tripping over all of these millions of people who are absolutely crying out for a party led by Yvette Cooper. If you are so confident in your assertion, please could you explain both the political and psephological thresholds that such a leader, and it would also be helpful here if you could varnish your "half decent leader" with a name, would have successfully overcome to "have a majority"? I think people prefer to make Corbyn their straw man because it's more palatable to them than to face the fact that the populist right is currently very galvanised and is enjoying a surge all over the world. Look at the US, Brazil, Australia, Russia and several European countries - most notably Estonia. Did all these leaders only get in because 'Corbyns' were running against them? As I've said before, I really think we're on the wrong side of history at the moment, and as time progresses there will be some awkward brushing under the carpet of 2010s and 2020s politics in many countries.
|
|
|
BREXIT
Jan 5, 2020 12:57:53 GMT
Post by 1paulcarden on Jan 5, 2020 12:57:53 GMT
Yep, exactly. Like the purity of Corbyn. Brought in to basically solve capitalism. Just like the left case for leaving the EU. Instead, we’ve had zero opposition and slept walked into disaster with two dire election performances,, his pitiful Brexit stance and shameful approach to anti Semitism. Labour should & would have had a majority by now with a half decent leader over the last 5 years. Instead it’s rotting in the political wilderness as it’s been lead by someone who could just about run a marmalade stall in Somerset.Polls have shown that this is total nonsense and yet it remains the common refrain of centrists for the last 5 years. Really weird but strangely enough, I'm never tripping over all of these millions of people who are absolutely crying out for a party led by Yvette Cooper. If you are so confident in your assertion, please could you explain both the political and psephological thresholds that such a leader, and it would also be helpful here if you could varnish your "half decent leader" with a name, would have successfully overcome to "have a majority"? You’ve learned absolutely nothing. No reflection of what’s happened. Polls were conveniently disregarded by you and the rest of the cultists when they consistently showed that Corbyn’s approval ratings with the British public were lower than any other opposition leader for 45 years. Quite the achievement when austerity, food banks, in work poverty are all flourishing. If you think Jess Phillips, Keir Starmer, David Lammy, Yvette Cooper even Lisa Nandy couldn’t capitalise on the open goals that The Dear Leader missed over the years then you’ve let your fan girl fawning overtake reality. Fact of the matter is, we’re in the horrific position we’re in equally down to Labour and Corbyns incompetence as it is down to Tory policy of screwing the country.
|
|
|
BREXIT
Jan 5, 2020 13:05:20 GMT
Post by Deva Chanter on Jan 5, 2020 13:05:20 GMT
Polls have shown that this is total nonsense and yet it remains the common refrain of centrists for the last 5 years. Really weird but strangely enough, I'm never tripping over all of these millions of people who are absolutely crying out for a party led by Yvette Cooper. If you are so confident in your assertion, please could you explain both the political and psephological thresholds that such a leader, and it would also be helpful here if you could varnish your "half decent leader" with a name, would have successfully overcome to "have a majority"? You’ve learned absolutely nothing. No reflection of what’s happened. Polls were conveniently disregarded by you and the rest of the cultists when they consistently showed that Corbyn’s approval ratings with the British public were lower than any other opposition leader for 45 years. Quite the achievement when austerity, food banks, in work poverty are all flourishing. If you think Jess Phillips, Keir Starmer, David Lammy, Yvette Cooper even Lisa Nandy couldn’t capitalise on the open goals that The Dear Leader missed over the years then you’ve let your fan girl fawning overtake reality. Fact of the matter is, we’re in the horrific position we’re in equally down to Labour and Corbyns incompetence as it is down to Tory policy of screwing the country. I think you will find that I've already posted on here about how I accept that Corbyn was a big issue on the doorstep and that we on the left need to reflect on that, but I suppose it is much easier for you to just call us all "cultists" isn't it? I see there was also no attempt made to explain the political and psephological thresholds required for such a victory to occur. I'll ask again, let's take Jess Phillips for example. Please could you explain how Jess Phillips leading the Labour Party over the last 3 years would have resulted in a Labour victory? Bear in mind that she is one of the examples you have given, is ultra-remain, has a history of transphobia and misogynoir and employed her evidently suitably qualified lift engineer of a husband as her office manager. I cite these just as some of the things that would have been used to attack her by opponents across the political spectrum. But I would be most fascinated to know how you think somebody of such a heavily pro-Remain persuasion would have stopped us losing 52 Northern Leave seats?
|
|
|
BREXIT
Jan 5, 2020 15:40:53 GMT
via mobile
Post by 1paulcarden on Jan 5, 2020 15:40:53 GMT
You’ve learned absolutely nothing. No reflection of what’s happened. Polls were conveniently disregarded by you and the rest of the cultists when they consistently showed that Corbyn’s approval ratings with the British public were lower than any other opposition leader for 45 years. Quite the achievement when austerity, food banks, in work poverty are all flourishing. If you think Jess Phillips, Keir Starmer, David Lammy, Yvette Cooper even Lisa Nandy couldn’t capitalise on the open goals that The Dear Leader missed over the years then you’ve let your fan girl fawning overtake reality. Fact of the matter is, we’re in the horrific position we’re in equally down to Labour and Corbyns incompetence as it is down to Tory policy of screwing the country. I think you will find that I've already posted on here about how I accept that Corbyn was a big issue on the doorstep and that we on the left need to reflect on that, but I suppose it is much easier for you to just call us all "cultists" isn't it? I see there was also no attempt made to explain the political and psephological thresholds required for such a victory to occur. I'll ask again, let's take Jess Phillips for example. Please could you explain how Jess Phillips leading the Labour Party over the last 3 years would have resulted in a Labour victory? Bear in mind that she is one of the examples you have given, is ultra-remain, has a history of transphobia and misogynoir and employed her evidently suitably qualified lift engineer of a husband as her office manager. I cite these just as some of the things that would have been used to attack her by opponents across the political spectrum. But I would be most fascinated to know how you think somebody of such a heavily pro-Remain persuasion would have stopped us losing 52 Northern Leave seats? By having a leader who was able to articulate that Leaving would damage jobs in manufacturing irreparably and would make austerity seem like a picnic? But as someone who voted Leave you obviously hate the EU more than austerity or job losses? Or was it the halfway house Leave that you wanted that was never going to happen? The ‘we’ll reopen the coal mines and pay for another house for Ian Lavery & wave goodbye to those nasty car manufacturers like Nissan & Airbus version of Leave?’ A leader who can grasp that this will not do any good to the country will be preferable to someone who’d rather spend the whole referendum campaign on holiday/planting radishes. Face it, you’ve messed up big time. Backed the wrong leader, backed the wrong side in the referendum and now there’s going to be a heck of a lot of work to get this country back to where it was in 2016, let alone the 90s. Time to let the adults have a go. Stick to the students union and Che Guevara t-shirts.
|
|
|
Post by Deva Chanter on Jan 5, 2020 16:41:32 GMT
I think you will find that I've already posted on here about how I accept that Corbyn was a big issue on the doorstep and that we on the left need to reflect on that, but I suppose it is much easier for you to just call us all "cultists" isn't it? I see there was also no attempt made to explain the political and psephological thresholds required for such a victory to occur. I'll ask again, let's take Jess Phillips for example. Please could you explain how Jess Phillips leading the Labour Party over the last 3 years would have resulted in a Labour victory? Bear in mind that she is one of the examples you have given, is ultra-remain, has a history of transphobia and misogynoir and employed her evidently suitably qualified lift engineer of a husband as her office manager. I cite these just as some of the things that would have been used to attack her by opponents across the political spectrum. But I would be most fascinated to know how you think somebody of such a heavily pro-Remain persuasion would have stopped us losing 52 Northern Leave seats? By having a leader who was able to articulate that Leaving would damage jobs in manufacturing irreparably and would make austerity seem like a picnic? But as someone who voted Leave you obviously hate the EU more than austerity or job losses? Or was it the halfway house Leave that you wanted that was never going to happen? The ‘we’ll reopen the coal mines and pay for another house for Ian Lavery & wave goodbye to those nasty car manufacturers like Nissan & Airbus version of Leave?’ A leader who can grasp that this will not do any good to the country will be preferable to someone who’d rather spend the whole referendum campaign on holiday/planting radishes. Face it, you’ve messed up big time. Backed the wrong leader, backed the wrong side in the referendum and now there’s going to be a heck of a lot of work to get this country back to where it was in 2016, let alone the 90s. Time to let the adults have a go. Stick to the students union and Che Guevara t-shirts. I mean if you are genuinely suggesting that Jess Phillips would have been capable of articulating that message appropriately then you really are beyond redemption. One of the most laughable things I've heard in a very long time. Contrary to your assertion, I don't hate the EU. One of the reasons I voted against it, in fact, is precisely because it legislates to make austerity a legal requirement of member states. But I suspect that's a level of nuance that's probably a bit more difficult to understand? Much easier to just label half the electorate as people who are too stupid not to have seen the light yet. Funny really, because the leader I backed won the leadership election. Twice. My side, as you put it, won the referendum. And weirdly, none of it required even one visit to a student union, nor a Che Guevara t-shirt. You have learnt precisely none of the lessons that led to either of those things happening and its why your brand of centrist politics is being put in the dustbin with hilarious frequency across the Western world. But at least you can go to sleep at night knowing you are one of the sensible ones, it's just everybody else who doesn't "get it" yet.
|
|
|
BREXIT
Jan 5, 2020 17:15:23 GMT
via mobile
Post by 1paulcarden on Jan 5, 2020 17:15:23 GMT
By having a leader who was able to articulate that Leaving would damage jobs in manufacturing irreparably and would make austerity seem like a picnic? But as someone who voted Leave you obviously hate the EU more than austerity or job losses? Or was it the halfway house Leave that you wanted that was never going to happen? The ‘we’ll reopen the coal mines and pay for another house for Ian Lavery & wave goodbye to those nasty car manufacturers like Nissan & Airbus version of Leave?’ A leader who can grasp that this will not do any good to the country will be preferable to someone who’d rather spend the whole referendum campaign on holiday/planting radishes. Face it, you’ve messed up big time. Backed the wrong leader, backed the wrong side in the referendum and now there’s going to be a heck of a lot of work to get this country back to where it was in 2016, let alone the 90s. Time to let the adults have a go. Stick to the students union and Che Guevara t-shirts. I mean if you are genuinely suggesting that Jess Phillips would have been capable of articulating that message appropriately then you really are beyond redemption. One of the most laughable things I've heard in a very long time. Contrary to your assertion, I don't hate the EU. One of the reasons I voted against it, in fact, is precisely because it legislates to make austerity a legal requirement of member states. But I suspect that's a level of nuance that's probably a bit more difficult to understand? Much easier to just label half the electorate as people who are too stupid not to have seen the light yet. Funny really, because the leader I backed won the leadership election. Twice. My side, as you put it, won the referendum. And weirdly, none of it required even one visit to a student union, nor a Che Guevara t-shirt. You have learnt precisely none of the lessons that led to either of those things happening and its why your brand of centrist politics is being put in the dustbin with hilarious frequency across the Western world. But at least you can go to sleep at night knowing you are one of the sensible ones, it's just everybody else who doesn't "get it" yet. Does The Canary not mention Portugal?
|
|
|
Post by jedthehumanoid on Jan 6, 2020 16:58:41 GMT
Glad that Keir Starmer is the current favourite, he's my pick for leader. When it comes to things like this I try to look at it from the perspective of someone who isn't politically engaged, not a member of any party but goes out to vote.
Who will look the best in the limited time this type of voter will engage with them? Forget any MSM, Tory, BBC bias or whatever just who will look, sound and come across the best as a possible PM? I think Keir Starmer is miles ahead in this regard. Even the 'sir' will probably rope in a few people as it sounds respectable.
|
|
|
BREXIT
Jan 6, 2020 18:43:38 GMT
via mobile
Post by Al on Jan 6, 2020 18:43:38 GMT
Starmer has my vote
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
BREXIT
Jan 6, 2020 19:21:46 GMT
Post by Deleted on Jan 6, 2020 19:21:46 GMT
|
|
|
BREXIT
Jan 6, 2020 20:00:42 GMT
via mobile
Post by Firestick Frank on Jan 6, 2020 20:00:42 GMT
Said it before and I’ll say it again, an ultra-Remainer London-centric knight of the realm will not win Labour back their northern Leave-voting seats.
|
|
|
BREXIT
Jan 6, 2020 20:43:19 GMT
via mobile
Post by Lobster on Jan 6, 2020 20:43:19 GMT
Will Leave/Remain still be a thing in the coming years anyway, or are we basing long-term decisions here on a current zeitgeist?
I mean, it's seems we are definitely leaving the EU now, so won't "Remainers" come to mean the opposite of what it does now (i.e. remain outside of the EU), and those now called "Remainers" will become Rejoiners or Reformers, but will there be the same appetite for that?
I'll be very disappointed if the moment we leave, we get politicians banging on for another referendum to get back in the EU. That ship has sailed now for me, do we really want to go through it all again?
It's time to move on from all this and accept that our foreseeable future is now outside of the EU and the priority is to elect someone who can make the best of that situation. I don't rule out the possibility of Brexit being a success, but I do rule out the possibility of it being a success under Boris Johnson.
|
|
|
BREXIT
Jan 6, 2020 23:35:38 GMT
via mobile
Post by Firestick Frank on Jan 6, 2020 23:35:38 GMT
Ian Lavery has announced he won’t be putting himself forward for the leadership and has thrown his support behind Rebecca Long-Bailey.
Important not to split the left vote.
|
|
|
BREXIT
Jan 7, 2020 7:35:02 GMT
via mobile
Post by Al on Jan 7, 2020 7:35:02 GMT
Said it before and I’ll say it again, an ultra-Remainer London-centric knight of the realm will not win Labour back their northern Leave-voting seats. Have you asked the northern leave voting seats what they want? Thought not.
|
|
|
BREXIT
Jan 7, 2020 7:37:06 GMT
via mobile
Post by Firestick Frank on Jan 7, 2020 7:37:06 GMT
Said it before and I’ll say it again, an ultra-Remainer London-centric knight of the realm will not win Labour back their northern Leave-voting seats. Have you asked the northern leave voting seats what they want? Thought not. They want Brexit mate. They wouldn’t trust a hard Remainer.
|
|
|
BREXIT
Jan 7, 2020 8:01:02 GMT
Post by Lobster on Jan 7, 2020 8:01:02 GMT
I'm waiting to see how the Brexit shitshow goes on January 31 and the weeks after before mailing my colours to the mast on who should be Labour's next leader. It makes sense that they're not rushing to appoint anyone.
|
|
|
BREXIT
Jan 7, 2020 8:05:48 GMT
via mobile
Post by Al on Jan 7, 2020 8:05:48 GMT
Have you asked the northern leave voting seats what they want? Thought not. They want Brexit mate. They wouldn’t trust a hard Remainer. And they've got it now. So what else do they want?
|
|
|
Post by jedthehumanoid on Jan 7, 2020 9:19:37 GMT
Said it before and I’ll say it again, an ultra-Remainer London-centric knight of the realm will not win Labour back their northern Leave-voting seats.
In 5 years time the argument should have moved on. Brexit will be well underway and I don't see any leader of the party pushing for a re-join stance, regardless of their previous position. As long as the Labour position is clear on wanting to make the best of Brexit and no re-join push then it'll be fine. Keep it simple (like 'get Brexit done') and repeat it whenever you're questioned (we've been very clear, no re-join, thank you). We've seen that it works, Boris Johnson flipped from remain to leave and stuck to the script.
As the son of a tool maker and a nurse Keir Starmer's working class credentials are rock solid even though I think background doesn't matter much to people when voting for a new PM, if it did Boris Johnson should have no chance in these working class, northern seats. His title may not appeal to you personally but there's swathes of the country that like that sort of thing and will pay attention to someone because of it.
|
|
|
BREXIT
Jan 7, 2020 9:42:39 GMT
Post by Lobster on Jan 7, 2020 9:42:39 GMT
What's interesting is that between 2017 and 2019, the actual number of people who vote Conservative went up from 13.6 million to 13.9 million. Considering the UK population is going up by about 400,000 a year, this doesn't really suggest to me that the Tories are attracting many more voters. It's more that other parties (Labour in particular) are losing them.
The Brexit Party, though they didn't win any seats, was a real spanner in the works for Labour, and the fiercely Remain stance of the Lib Dems and Greens probably took a few voters off them too. Because of our peculiar voting system, the margins between a landside and no majority can be pretty small.
One thing that's barely been mentioned is that turnout was down by 1.5% percentage points from 2017. That's out of keeping with recent elections, and I think shows how helpless and fed up a lot of people feel about politics. I think that's especially the case on the left, among liberals and Remain voters, who I don't think are quite as single-minded as those who just seem to want to get out of the EU and worry about everything else later. I've always seen Brexit as little more than a battle over the direction of the Conservative Party, and unfortunately it's had a "divide and conquer" effect on the nation that the far-right has capitalised on.
|
|
|
BREXIT
Jan 7, 2020 10:25:04 GMT
Post by iandychesterfc on Jan 7, 2020 10:25:04 GMT
Indeed Lobster, an awful lot of people felt they had no-one to vote for so didn't vote. Thats one of the point being made, the lack of viabe alternative FOR SOME PEOPLE. (emphasis before the usual increase vote since 2005 yah yah yah)
|
|
|
BREXIT
Jan 7, 2020 11:19:04 GMT
via mobile
Post by Firestick Frank on Jan 7, 2020 11:19:04 GMT
Said it before and I’ll say it again, an ultra-Remainer London-centric knight of the realm will not win Labour back their northern Leave-voting seats.
In 5 years time the argument should have moved on. Brexit will be well underway and I don't see any leader of the party pushing for a re-join stance, regardless of their previous position. As long as the Labour position is clear on wanting to make the best of Brexit and no re-join push then it'll be fine. Keep it simple (like 'get Brexit done') and repeat it whenever you're questioned (we've been very clear, no re-join, thank you). We've seen that it works, Boris Johnson flipped from remain to leave and stuck to the script.
As the son of a tool maker and a nurse Keir Starmer's working class credentials are rock solid even though I think background doesn't matter much to people when voting for a new PM, if it did Boris Johnson should have no chance in these working class, northern seats. His title may not appeal to you personally but there's swathes of the country that like that sort of thing and will pay attention to someone because of it.
Fair enough that’s a fair assessment (as is Lobster’s) and I can only hope you are both proved correct.
|
|
|
BREXIT
Jan 7, 2020 16:02:13 GMT
Post by Firestick Frank on Jan 7, 2020 16:02:13 GMT
“Hopes of a flurry of post-Brexit trade deals were dashed this week after the Australian government rejected a UK offer that included visa-free work and travel between the two countries. Trade minister Simon Birmingham said full free movement would not be accepted because it could cause an exodus of highly trained workers to the UK and an influx of unskilled British workers to Sydney and Melbourne.“ First blow for post-Brexit Britain trade talks Oh dear, looks like Australia don’t want our masses of unskilled immigrants...
|
|
|
BREXIT
Jan 7, 2020 18:20:01 GMT
via mobile
Post by Firestick Frank on Jan 7, 2020 18:20:01 GMT
Corbyn was absolutely superb at the despatch box today, I must say. Let’s hope his successor, whoever they may be, can follow suit of forcing issues and holding the government to account over the next few years.
|
|
|
BREXIT
Jan 7, 2020 21:37:05 GMT
via mobile
Post by Firestick Frank on Jan 7, 2020 21:37:05 GMT
Kier Starmer’s inner circle running his campaign includes staff from Owen Smith’s failed chicken coup, CHUK TIGgers and, worryingly, private healthcare lobbyists.
His own voting record doesn’t look good either (abstaining on the Welfare Bill 2015).
|
|
|
BREXIT
Jan 8, 2020 8:11:30 GMT
via mobile
Post by Firestick Frank on Jan 8, 2020 8:11:30 GMT
BBC spending all day focusing on talking smack about Rebecca Long Bailey (including a bizarre pisstake of “Oh Jeremy Corbyn” chants) and hardly a word on the Prime Minister not turning up to address parliament on the dangerous situation in Iran. Shouldn’t expect anything else though should we?
|
|
ddod
Junior Member
Posts: 76
|
BREXIT
Jan 8, 2020 12:32:31 GMT
Post by ddod on Jan 8, 2020 12:32:31 GMT
Well he's got a county to run and a big Brexit deal to finalise. He's probably delegated that task out to other people Nathen.
|
|