|
|
Post by wxmred on Jul 23, 2021 16:58:28 GMT
with these clubs now throwing money around..where does it leave the the fan owned teams like us, we just cant compete...a few of years ago we could have had a chance of moving up the EFL or at least dreamed about it, now that prospect has sadly disappeared..will fans come to support a club that has very little chance of progression to the upper tiers ?... But we are not throwing money around, If you look at our signings up to now this season. From what I have heard Mullin was a free transfer I might be wrong and I will hold my hands up if i am |
|
|
|
Post by Anders on Jul 23, 2021 19:14:13 GMT
with these clubs now throwing money around..where does it leave the the fan owned teams like us, we just cant compete...a few of years ago we could have had a chance of moving up the EFL or at least dreamed about it, now that prospect has sadly disappeared..will fans come to support a club that has very little chance of progression to the upper tiers ?... But we are not throwing money around, If you look at our signings up to now this season. From what I have heard Mullin was a free transfer I might be wrong and I will hold my hands up if i am Mullin rejected a new deal at Cambridge for £3k a week plus goal bonus so you are paying more than that.
|
|
|
|
Post by arthuro on Jul 24, 2021 8:47:38 GMT
So with wages, agents fees bonuses, signing fee Wrexham are spending around 750 k over 3 years on a player who has had one prolific season in eight years. This is only going one way.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Goats
Jul 24, 2021 11:26:12 GMT
via mobile
Post by Deleted on Jul 24, 2021 11:26:12 GMT
So with wages, agents fees bonuses, signing fee Wrexham are spending around 750 k over 3 years on a player who has had one prolific season in eight years. This is only going one way. Yes upwards |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Goats
Jul 24, 2021 11:28:44 GMT
via mobile
Post by Deleted on Jul 24, 2021 11:28:44 GMT
Mullin has had one prolific season otherwise just a guy who gets the odd goal just because your prolific for one club doesn't mean he will be for another Agree in part but bet you would pull your own teeth out for such a player in your team ? I fully understand the jealousy and we would probably feel the same if rolls were reversed but who knows what the future holds I am just holding on and enjoying the ride !!! No they want Gary Roberts back |
|
|
|
Post by arthuro on Jul 24, 2021 11:30:47 GMT
So with wages, agents fees bonuses, signing fee Wrexham are spending around 750 k over 3 years on a player who has had one prolific season in eight years. This is only going one way. Yes upwards Unsustainable. |
|
wil
New Member
Posts: 37 
|
Goats
Jul 24, 2021 12:10:41 GMT
via mobile
Post by wil on Jul 24, 2021 12:10:41 GMT
Unsustainable if you're on the bones of you're arse with no pot to pee in. But..... And for the record this isn't a nose rubbing post, god knows we know only too well whats it like to scrape the barrel for players. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Goats
Jul 24, 2021 13:44:25 GMT
via mobile
Post by Deleted on Jul 24, 2021 13:44:25 GMT
|
|
|
|
Goats
Jul 24, 2021 19:51:57 GMT
Post by rossettred on Jul 24, 2021 19:51:57 GMT
Mullin has had one prolific season otherwise just a guy who gets the odd goal just because your prolific for one club doesn't mean he will be for another We know you wouldn't want him in your team
Just accept we now have a professional set up with money behind us - doesn't guarentee promotion but would any Chester supporter not want to be in our position?
We all know the answer don't we ......
|
|
|
|
Post by Lobster on Jul 24, 2021 20:11:49 GMT
Mullin has had one prolific season otherwise just a guy who gets the odd goal just because your prolific for one club doesn't mean he will be for another We know you wouldn't want him in your team
Just accept we now have a professional set up with money behind us - doesn't guarentee promotion but would any Chester supporter not want to be in our position?
We all know the answer don't we ......
Second bottom? Not really  |
|
