|
Post by dmcnally on Aug 16, 2017 17:57:15 GMT
If we were a poor team, we wouldn't have drawn 1-1 at one of the best teams in the league. If they are one of the best teams in the league they wouldn't have failed to win any of their opening four matches. They'll still finish in a play off spot. 100%
|
|
|
Post by Lobster on Aug 16, 2017 18:14:20 GMT
If we were a poor team, we wouldn't have drawn 1-1 at one of the best teams in the league. If they are one of the best teams in the league they wouldn't have failed to win any of their opening four matches. And there was me thinking the season went on till late April!
|
|
|
Post by superman on Aug 16, 2017 18:20:44 GMT
Thanks and well done to the 180 or so fans who attended the game and supported OUR team at Hartlepool. Thanks also to the mixed but balanced reports from a number of people who were there. You gain a much better insight from these than the noise generated by those who seem to have only one agenda. I have previously stated that I have my own reservations about whether Jon McCarthy is the right man for the job, but for now the board have seen fit to continue with his services for this season and he needs to be given time with what is largely a new team. Getting on his back after 3 games is not going to help. Realistically I am not expecting big wins from expansive play, happy to have positive results from hard graft, good organisation and team effort and I think we have enough in the squad to achieve this.
|
|
|
Post by bing on Aug 16, 2017 18:34:56 GMT
A poor team? On paper than team is top 3 at least. Funny I see their fans saying we played well tonight, odd our own fans can't say the same!!! You clearly didn't read the post on Hartlepools forum which said 'if there is a worse team in this league than Chester, I will be amazed'. Always a bit wary of fans' forums of relegated football league sides as some posters can come over a bit bitter with delusions of grandeur.
|
|
|
Post by paulie on Aug 16, 2017 20:00:21 GMT
You clearly didn't read the post on Hartlepools forum which said 'if there is a worse team in this league than Chester, I will be amazed'. If we were a poor team, we wouldn't have drawn 1-1 at one of the best teams in the league. They are flying high in 19th position.
|
|
|
Post by dmcnally on Aug 16, 2017 21:18:02 GMT
If we were a poor team, we wouldn't have drawn 1-1 at one of the best teams in the league. They are flying high in 19th position. Becuase the table actually matters after a few games. They'll be in the play offs.
|
|
|
Post by dmcnally on Aug 16, 2017 21:43:41 GMT
Chester FC TV highlights out. These are a little less bias and actually include some of our chances.
|
|
|
Post by southernblue on Aug 16, 2017 23:47:54 GMT
You clearly didn't read the post on Hartlepools forum which said 'if there is a worse team in this league than Chester, I will be amazed'. Always a bit wary of fans' forums of relegated football league sides as some posters can come over a bit bitter with delusions of grandeur. Reminds me of when we first came down from the league and our Conference Tour tee-shirts at the first away fixture at Rushden and Diamonds. We soon had a reality check.
|
|
|
Post by Al on Aug 17, 2017 6:23:22 GMT
Chester FC TV highlights out. These are a little less bias and actually include some of our chances. Sorry Danny but from those highlights it confirms we got battered for the majority of the game. Looking the chances they created. Look at how the opposition always get the full backs forward as often as possible on the overlap. We should be looking to do that at every opportunity especially with the like of Halls at right back with his delivery. We just get the ball out to Craig Mahon and don't commit enough players forward to support or build a proper attack. The negative tactics does my Swede in. These are bloody good footballers that we have at this club now and it still feels like he can't use them correctly
|
|
|
Post by Al on Aug 17, 2017 6:24:54 GMT
Chester FC TV highlights out. These are a little less bias and actually include some of our chances. Sorry Danny but from those highlights it confirms we got battered for the majority of the game. Looking the chances they created. Look at how the opposition always get the full backs forward as often as possible on the overlap. We should be looking to do that at every opportunity especially with the like of Halls at right back with his delivery. We just get the ball out to Craig Mahon and don't commit enough players forward to support or build a proper attack. The negative tactics does my Swede in. These are bloody good footballers that we have at this club now and it still feels like he can't use them correctly It's all too kick and rush. Sorry but if I want kick and rush football I'll go to any local park pitch on a Sunday morning instead
|
|
|
Post by dmcnally on Aug 17, 2017 12:03:06 GMT
Chester FC TV highlights out. These are a little less bias and actually include some of our chances. Sorry Danny but from those highlights it confirms we got battered for the majority of the game. Looking the chances they created. Look at how the opposition always get the full backs forward as often as possible on the overlap. We should be looking to do that at every opportunity especially with the like of Halls at right back with his delivery. We just get the ball out to Craig Mahon and don't commit enough players forward to support or build a proper attack. The negative tactics does my Swede in. These are bloody good footballers that we have at this club now and it still feels like he can't use them correctly Do we just not expect any pressure from Hartlepool then? Of course they were going to be on top for large parts of the game. Any team away from home at a big club is going to defend a lead.
|
|
|
Post by Al on Aug 17, 2017 12:23:24 GMT
Sorry but it's that mentality that does my swede in.
Yes we should expect pressure but by god I would expect us to do more to support the front two. We have zero width. Watch the highlights and see how much space we gave Hartlepool down the flanks, inviting their full backs to bomb it forward putting balls into the box.
It's asking for trouble. Our style of play is far too negative. Others have said it themselves, switching from 442 to 451 at half time said it all. Leaving Hannah upfront with zero support. We've a better side than that. Halifax and 2nd half vs Fylde was exactly the same story. Sit far too deep, don't win any second balls, keep the full backs deep which keeps the wide midfielders deep as well. Gives the forwards absolutely no support whatsoever. It's a farce.
|
|
|
Post by dmcnally on Aug 17, 2017 12:37:11 GMT
Sorry but it's that mentality that does my swede in. Yes we should expect pressure but by god I would expect us to do more to support the front two. We have zero width. Watch the highlights and see how much space we gave Hartlepool down the flanks, inviting their full backs to bomb it forward putting balls into the box. It's asking for trouble. Our style of play is far too negative. Others have said it themselves, switching from 442 to 451 at half time said it all. Leaving Hannah upfront with zero support. We've a better side than that. Halifax and 2nd half vs Fylde was exactly the same story. Sit far too deep, don't win any second balls, keep the full backs deep which keeps the wide midfielders deep as well. Gives the forwards absolutely no support whatsoever. It's a farce. I don't need to see the highlights, I saw the full 90 minutes in person. We had width, with Chappell coming on and Mahon playing most of the match, we just didn't use it effectively as we were under the cosh so much. I believe if we continued in 442, and let our midfield get torn apart; we'd have lost that game.
|
|
|
Post by hanoiblue on Aug 17, 2017 14:35:26 GMT
Sorry but it's that mentality that does my swede in. Yes we should expect pressure but by god I would expect us to do more to support the front two. We have zero width. Watch the highlights and see how much space we gave Hartlepool down the flanks, inviting their full backs to bomb it forward putting balls into the box. It's asking for trouble. Our style of play is far too negative. Others have said it themselves, switching from 442 to 451 at half time said it all. Leaving Hannah upfront with zero support. We've a better side than that. Halifax and 2nd half vs Fylde was exactly the same story. Sit far too deep, don't win any second balls, keep the full backs deep which keeps the wide midfielders deep as well. Gives the forwards absolutely no support whatsoever. It's a farce. I don't need to see the highlights, I saw the full 90 minutes in person. We had width, with Chappell coming on and Mahon playing most of the match, we just didn't use it effectively as we were under the cosh so much. I believe if we continued in 442, and let our midfield get torn apart; we'd have lost that game. How on earth are you this optimistic? I haven't seen these kind of tactics employed since the smaller teams did it to us in the evo-stik. Bypassing the midfield, no width (don't kid yourself I was there too)- Mahon looks lost and doesn't attack the byline like he used to, just cuts in and doesn't know where to go. As soon as we got that first goal we were on the back-foot, not because Hartlepool were creating much, but because we invite the pressure onto ourselves with these dire tactics. If we'd have stayed on the front foot from that first minute their defence wouldn't have been able to handle Akintunde or Hannah running at them - their centre backs looked all over the place and scared to go anywhere near our two strikers. We invite so much pressure onto ourselves we look like a team in the FA cup hanging on for dear life against a side 2/3 leagues above us, and that is embarrassing. 11 men back defending corners is ridiculous. you put 1 up at least and that takes 2 of theirs out of the box too. No outlet from defence= balls coming back into the box straight away, absolutely no time to reorganise that back line. Hartlepool looked solid enough, but were there for the taking. We should have lost that by 3 or 4. It completely sucks the life out of the support- no one could have enjoyed it as a spectacle surely? JM will be gone by October once the crowds are sub 1500 consistently. No neutral or floating fans will pay money to watch us hang on like that every week. As I said before- truly embarrassing.
|
|
|
Post by marner93 on Aug 17, 2017 15:01:15 GMT
Sorry but it's that mentality that does my swede in. Yes we should expect pressure but by god I would expect us to do more to support the front two. We have zero width. Watch the highlights and see how much space we gave Hartlepool down the flanks, inviting their full backs to bomb it forward putting balls into the box. It's asking for trouble. Our style of play is far too negative. Others have said it themselves, switching from 442 to 451 at half time said it all. Leaving Hannah upfront with zero support. We've a better side than that. Halifax and 2nd half vs Fylde was exactly the same story. Sit far too deep, don't win any second balls, keep the full backs deep which keeps the wide midfielders deep as well. Gives the forwards absolutely no support whatsoever. It's a farce. I don't need to see the highlights, I saw the full 90 minutes in person. We had width, with Chappell coming on and Mahon playing most of the match, we just didn't use it effectively as we were under the cosh so much. I believe if we continued in 442, and let our midfield get torn apart; we'd have lost that game. Well done superfan, a decade ago I'd of been there as well, however rewatching games and highlights you never know, you might see something you didn't see first time round.
|
|
|
Post by Al on Aug 17, 2017 15:47:07 GMT
I've watched the highlights again, paused, and summarised it. Our problems lie with 3 things. No Width, No Support when we do occasionally get the ball into a wide area, and failure to win any second balls.
That is down to McCarthy for me. Halls and LRT are so deep it is unbelievable. Both are more than capable going forward, we know what sort of ball that Halls can put in the box when he's given a bit of freedom to overlap, but, for whatever reason he's just not doing it. For me, that's down to the tactics they're being given by the man in charge.
3 occasions in those highlights where Halls or LRT advancing forward would have got us in behind the defence, instead they stay out of shot, and Mahon is forced inside. This is where we should be looking to stretch the opposition and give Hannah a bit more space in the box for when the ball DOES come in.
It's basic bloody stuff this.
|
|
|
Post by Firestick Frank on Aug 17, 2017 16:42:02 GMT
We invite so much pressure onto ourselves we look like a team in the FA cup hanging on for dear life against a side 2/3 leagues above us, and that is embarrassing. 11 men back defending corners is ridiculous. you put 1 up at least and that takes 2 of theirs out of the box too. No outlet from defence= balls coming back into the box straight away, absolutely no time to reorganise that back line. Spot on with that FA Cup tie line - I've used that myself. It's dreadful to watch at home against teams perceived to be worse than us.
|
|
|
Post by Anders on Aug 17, 2017 17:26:43 GMT
I don't need to see the highlights, I saw the full 90 minutes in person. We had width, with Chappell coming on and Mahon playing most of the match, we just didn't use it effectively as we were under the cosh so much. I believe if we continued in 442, and let our midfield get torn apart; we'd have lost that game. How on earth are you this optimistic? I haven't seen these kind of tactics employed since the smaller teams did it to us in the evo-stik. Bypassing the midfield, no width (don't kid yourself I was there too)- Mahon looks lost and doesn't attack the byline like he used to, just cuts in and doesn't know where to go. As soon as we got that first goal we were on the back-foot, not because Hartlepool were creating much, but because we invite the pressure onto ourselves with these dire tactics. If we'd have stayed on the front foot from that first minute their defence wouldn't have been able to handle Akintunde or Hannah running at them - their centre backs looked all over the place and scared to go anywhere near our two strikers. We invite so much pressure onto ourselves we look like a team in the FA cup hanging on for dear life against a side 2/3 leagues above us, and that is embarrassing. 11 men back defending corners is ridiculous. you put 1 up at least and that takes 2 of theirs out of the box too. No outlet from defence= balls coming back into the box straight away, absolutely no time to reorganise that back line. Hartlepool looked solid enough, but were there for the taking. We should have lost that by 3 or 4. It completely sucks the life out of the support- no one could have enjoyed it as a spectacle surely? JM will be gone by October once the crowds are sub 1500 consistently. No neutral or floating fans will pay money to watch us hang on like that every week. As I said before- truly embarrassing. I was going to post something very similar to that bit in bold, it's all a bit small time. At the moment we also get McCarthy hailing our upcoming opposition in the press beforehand as an ‘outstanding team’ or similar along those lines. They’re nothing of the sort; in fact all three we’ve faced so far are currently beneath us with no wins between them from 12 games. Overestimating every opposition makes it easier to justify such negative and defensive tactics. Any team that plays the ball on the deck a bit looks good against us as we sit back and allow it. I’m hoping he’s just trying to get a few hard fought points on the board to ease the pressure of being stuck on virtually nothing. He has to change his mentality and fast as the crowds will/are falling and we can’t afford it.
|
|
|
Post by Harry Lime on Aug 17, 2017 18:23:11 GMT
I don't need to see the highlights, I saw the full 90 minutes in person. We had width, with Chappell coming on and Mahon playing most of the match, we just didn't use it effectively as we were under the cosh so much. I believe if we continued in 442, and let our midfield get torn apart; we'd have lost that game. How on earth are you this optimistic? I haven't seen these kind of tactics employed since the smaller teams did it to us in the evo-stik. Bypassing the midfield, no width (don't kid yourself I was there too)- Mahon looks lost and doesn't attack the byline like he used to, just cuts in and doesn't know where to go. As soon as we got that first goal we were on the back-foot, not because Hartlepool were creating much, but because we invite the pressure onto ourselves with these dire tactics. If we'd have stayed on the front foot from that first minute their defence wouldn't have been able to handle Akintunde or Hannah running at them - their centre backs looked all over the place and scared to go anywhere near our two strikers. We invite so much pressure onto ourselves we look like a team in the FA cup hanging on for dear life against a side 2/3 leagues above us, and that is embarrassing. 11 men back defending corners is ridiculous. you put 1 up at least and that takes 2 of theirs out of the box too. No outlet from defence= balls coming back into the box straight away, absolutely no time to reorganise that back line. Hartlepool looked solid enough, but were there for the taking. We should have lost that by 3 or 4. It completely sucks the life out of the support- no one could have enjoyed it as a spectacle surely? JM will be gone by October once the crowds are sub 1500 consistently. No neutral or floating fans will pay money to watch us hang on like that every week. As I said before- truly embarrassing. I'd tend to agree with dmcnally that had we stayed with 4 4 2 we would likely have lost that game. I'm not convinced we intentionally dropped back. We were getting ripped apart during the latter stages of the first half. Generally though, I would side with the dissenters. We are well drilled. However, the narrow set up and defending often leaves us without an out ball. JM needs to sort that out quickly. I'm also not convinced our players are as good as some posters seem to think. If we flood forward and leave ourselves open to the counter we will struggle. Our two centre halves are really good, but have little pace. That means we don't push them up far. The full backs cover them really well. That means they are often too narrow. Leaving us susceptible to crosses, and lots of them! Midfield then sits in front of the deep back four etc etc. JMc maybe setting his team up to get the best results from those players. It maybe the style of play that you don't like. Alladyce and Pulis are always quoted as managers to get the best from their players. However, all the supporters from those clubs quickly got fed up with their style of play, and wanted them out. Problem JMc has is that results aren't good either, especially at home. It's difficult to see how he gets everyone back on side now. We might get some good results. We might play well in some games. Whether we can do both often enough is questionable. The worrying thing is. . . . I'm not sure anyone else could get us too either. Maybe that is the reality of our situation. Don't beat the optimism out of people like dmcnally and Rio etc, otherwise they'll get as cynical and downbeat as the rest of us before their time. That's needs to dawn on you after years of disappointment.
|
|
|
Post by hanoiblue on Aug 17, 2017 19:17:35 GMT
How on earth are you this optimistic? I haven't seen these kind of tactics employed since the smaller teams did it to us in the evo-stik. Bypassing the midfield, no width (don't kid yourself I was there too)- Mahon looks lost and doesn't attack the byline like he used to, just cuts in and doesn't know where to go. As soon as we got that first goal we were on the back-foot, not because Hartlepool were creating much, but because we invite the pressure onto ourselves with these dire tactics. If we'd have stayed on the front foot from that first minute their defence wouldn't have been able to handle Akintunde or Hannah running at them - their centre backs looked all over the place and scared to go anywhere near our two strikers. We invite so much pressure onto ourselves we look like a team in the FA cup hanging on for dear life against a side 2/3 leagues above us, and that is embarrassing. 11 men back defending corners is ridiculous. you put 1 up at least and that takes 2 of theirs out of the box too. No outlet from defence= balls coming back into the box straight away, absolutely no time to reorganise that back line. Hartlepool looked solid enough, but were there for the taking. We should have lost that by 3 or 4. It completely sucks the life out of the support- no one could have enjoyed it as a spectacle surely? JM will be gone by October once the crowds are sub 1500 consistently. No neutral or floating fans will pay money to watch us hang on like that every week. As I said before- truly embarrassing. I'd tend to agree with dmcnally that had we stayed with 4 4 2 we would likely have lost that game. I'm not convinced we intentionally dropped back. We were getting ripped apart during the latter stages of the first half. Generally though, I would side with the dissenters. We are well drilled. However, the narrow set up and defending often leaves us without an out ball. JM needs to sort that out quickly. I'm also not convinced our players are as good as some posters seem to think. If we flood forward and leave ourselves open to the counter we will struggle. Our two centre halves are really good, but have little pace. That means we don't push them up far. The full backs cover them really well. That means they are often too narrow. Leaving us susceptible to crosses, and lots of them! Midfield then sits in front of the deep back four etc etc. JMc maybe setting his team up to get the best results from those players. It maybe the style of play that you don't like. Alladyce and Pulis are always quoted as managers to get the best from their players. However, all the supporters from those clubs quickly got fed up with their style of play, and wanted them out. Problem JMc has is that results aren't good either, especially at home. It's difficult to see how he gets everyone back on side now. We might get some good results. We might play well in some games. Whether we can do both often enough is questionable. The worrying thing is. . . . I'm not sure anyone else could get us too either. Maybe that is the reality of our situation. Don't beat the optimism out of people like dmcnally and Rio etc, otherwise they'll get as cynical and downbeat as the rest of us before their time. That's needs to dawn on you after years of disappointment. Understand what you're saying completely, the lack of pace at the back does mean we have to cover up those cracks, when they start to appear, from the midfield. However, I don't think we're required to do that for 85 minutes of the game, especially at this level. We know Kingsley can put a tackle in, why not leave him back to mop up defence and put those balls over the top when needed, and let Turnbull push up a bit, so he can distribute the ball on the deck which is, by reputation, what he's good at. Dawson isn't an out-and-out winger and tends to drift in, but he always gets back to help Halls on that right side, but Mahon is really causing us problems with his lack of positional awareness when he's supposed to be defending- as soon as teams realise he doesn't track back, there's been overlaps and crosses time and time again down that left hand side. LRT looks to be a solid left back, but again he hasn't got the pace to deal with any kind of 2-on-1 situation on his flank. Fylde exploited it, Halifax did too, Hartlepool cottoned on with about 25 to go and the Chappell came on who, despite his shortcomings, does tend to track the overlap from the opposition well. We've rode our luck to nearly breaking point in the first 3 games already. It won't take long for this side to be on the end of some 4/5-0s once the better squads really get into their stride. My first match was in the 03/04 season, so it hasn't taken me too long to get downhearted as the rest of the more senior posters on here . But I can honestly say that these tactics are really the most simple, amateurish tactics I've ever seen us play with. You can tell with 10 minutes to go on Tuesday the players were really intent to waste as much time as possible, staying down after a tackle - and I honestly don't think this is down to anyone but the management team. They're instilling somewhat of a tin-pot club mentality on us, the kind we used to laugh at when we were winning every week. There is talent in this squad, and Akintunde won't be with us for long, he's looked like an absolute gem of a number 9 so far this season, one of the only players who seems to be able to beat his man with ease and have the time to look up for the pass. That'll be a real asset if every now and then the full-backs have the freedom to push up a little more. You see, at least I tried to end with some positivity!
|
|
|
Post by devablue on Aug 17, 2017 20:44:05 GMT
I was going to post something very similar to that bit in bold, it's all a bit small time. At the moment we also get McCarthy hailing our upcoming opposition in the press beforehand as an ‘outstanding team’ or similar along those lines. They’re nothing of the sort; in fact all three we’ve faced so far are currently beneath us with no wins between them from 12 games. Overestimating every opposition makes it easier to justify such negative and defensive tactics. Any team that plays the ball on the deck a bit looks good against us as we sit back and allow it. I’m hoping he’s just trying to get a few hard fought points on the board to ease the pressure of being stuck on virtually nothing. He has to change his mentality and fast as the crowds will/are falling and we can’t afford it. Now that is concerning. The worst part is the biggest test of them all so far will be in form Sutton on saturday.
|
|
|
Post by jb on Aug 17, 2017 20:50:27 GMT
The biggest question those highlights leave me with is what is that awful music Hartlepool come out to? Sounds like some crap Knopfler did that wasn't accepted by the producers of "Auf Weidersen Pet". Shocking stuff!
I think they need Mancot Blue to get down there with his "Best of 90's dance" including "Sunshine after the Rain", "Im Blue" and "Scatman".
|
|
|
Post by sqzl on Aug 18, 2017 9:10:44 GMT
I was going to post something very similar to that bit in bold, it's all a bit small time. At the moment we also get McCarthy hailing our upcoming opposition in the press beforehand as an ‘outstanding team’ or similar along those lines. They’re nothing of the sort; in fact all three we’ve faced so far are currently beneath us with no wins between them from 12 games. Overestimating every opposition makes it easier to justify such negative and defensive tactics. Any team that plays the ball on the deck a bit looks good against us as we sit back and allow it. I’m hoping he’s just trying to get a few hard fought points on the board to ease the pressure of being stuck on virtually nothing. He has to change his mentality and fast as the crowds will/are falling and we can’t afford it. Now that is concerning. The worst part is the biggest test of them all so far will be in form Sutton on saturday. Sutton are an outstanding team, they'll be up there this season Sarcasm intended. However they do look a decent side and i think we need to step it up to maintain the fantastic unbeaten start to the season. If anything, we need to be a bit less expansive and stop Mahony and Dawson staying so wide because we just had an abundance of width at Hartlepool. Definitely need to drop Akintunde, he scored last game and he got MOTM on opening day. I'd start Wade Joyce, known as the Pirlo of the conference and go for a solid but effective 4-6-0 formation that worked so well at Hartlepool (maybe the worst second half i've gone and witnessed in a while) If there's on thing for certain tomorrow, it's that we will play like the away team and try and hit them on the break with at one isolated striker if we're lucky.
|
|
|
Post by hughdemann on Aug 18, 2017 14:00:22 GMT
Was there a "hand of god" moment with their equaliser, cannot see how our keeper didn't get it, and the forwards arm was definitely up there.
Cannot complain with a draw on the basis of the highlights, two very sweet shots of theirs that hit the woodwork, plus the header, they must have thought they would never score
|
|
|
Post by Malcolm Tucker on Aug 18, 2017 17:59:26 GMT
We probably would have lost if playing 4-4-2, but it would have been nice to have someone playing in attack for at least part of the game.
|
|